Shannon's napkin

 

Shannon's entropy and informatic or bits-like entropy is not the same as all entropy. It's Galilei, Copernico and Newton's entropy (at least on the northern-western hemisphere, kinda), and that's that first. Then, error analysis cannot be <homogeneous> (aren't we all anti-homogeneous stuff, models, systems, complex systems, complex dinamycs, STEM dudes?), nor one single homogenous model or whatever, precisely because it's not only bits-like info-like entropy. Even if you tried to make an equivalence between all of those, even aproximately, error analysis by itself would have to fade away as just a Shannon's entropy like entropy analysis. And there's no possible entropy analysis either because it's fucking entropy. Literally. Tautological and trivial entropy. So there's no info or data or bits-like states of matter, because that's not another state of matter, but the same digitally whatever state of matter itself, and there's only three dialectical states of matter at all. if you didn't knew.

Bentham was wrong, not you gals and guys. There's no possible way to measure exactly morphosyntax nor texts, nor humours nor emotions, nor cognition at all. It is possible that cognition just like emotion, is just a total cognitive synthesis of all subject's perceptions and sensations and emotions, and consicousness, and preconsiousness and and unknowable, undecipherable unconscioncious, precisely, because utilitarianism is wrong, and utilitarism is NOT the same as empiricism, pragmatism, functionalism, nor positivism AT ALL. Precisely because is not homogeneous. Think trivially, think tautologically, and think. Then think first, act last. There’s no possible measure of temperature, no possible measure of climate, your’s just STEAM-like formalist and postmodernly-like, picking up random and esthocastic signals like idiots.